|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:34:00 AM
From Authorid: 49101
That IS an interesting question! MissC.  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:35:00 AM
From Authorid: 19092
I'll keep my "King James Version"...  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:35:00 AM
From Authorid: 46014
Hahaha....can't help think of the "Pat" character on saturday night live.. Personally, I think it's silly.  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 8:38:00 AM
From Authorid: 46530
About as rediculous a notion as a "Snowperson" Are they going to say that Mary wasn't a woman too? *Farleys*  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:42:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
I wonder if they will return to his original last name Panthera? Wouldnt that embarass the Church. Bye for now. Enki  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:45:00 AM
From Authorid: 47539
Isn't that the silliest thing? What idiot came up with the idea of a gender neutral bible anyway? Let's see: Now we have "Our Parent, who art in Heaven".  |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:53:00 AM
From Authorid: 19382
"God created Person, and saw it was good, and then he created person from the rib of person..." .... o_O-bah? .  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 8:54:00 AM
From Authorid: 45883
what is next?? the woman's supremisits group will want jesus to be a woman? |
Date: 1/28/2002 8:55:00 AM
From Authorid: 25828
LOL - i'd love to read the genderless version LOL LOL  |
| Date: 1/28/2002 8:57:00 AM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 37354 It sounds like it will be good for laughs. Hugo |
Date: 1/28/2002 9:04:00 AM
From Authorid: 16671
I'll stick with the bible I have, thank you.  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 9:09:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Shieznitz, Back in the 80's the largest United Church in Canada, located in Toronto built a statue of jesus for thier church. They put full female breasts on the statue so that women would more easily identify with jesus. If a Christian Church will do that why would it surprise the world if the heathens do it. Bye for now. Enki |
Date: 1/28/2002 9:32:00 AM
From Authorid: 15777
Why change something that's not broke? its worked for how many years now???? People make me sick and have WAY to much time on their hands to think of petty stuff like this and change history as it is....HELLO God is your God..nothing less!  |
Date: 1/28/2002 9:37:00 AM
From Authorid: 14407
His name has already been changed once. His real name was Joshua. It was changed to the Greek Jesus (or the latin Iesus) to make his name more palatable in the west.-Gandwere  |
Date: 1/28/2002 10:01:00 AM
From Authorid: 26573
LOL Hugo!! It could be Chris, Jo, or Bobbi(y)!  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 10:14:00 AM
From Authorid: 16671
Oh my gosh ENKI I didnt know that!!! Oh well look at all the POPE does and he says hes christian?? |
Date: 1/28/2002 10:42:00 AM
From Authorid: 33817
Well, God has no need for sexual reproduction, so I don't think he's a man. And, Jesus, the byproduct of asexual reproduction, which either A)made him an exact clone of his mother and therefore a WOMAN or B)he was made as a duplicate of his "father" (which he didn't HAVE) and therefore was the non-gender specific God type. I think this idea makes more sense than 85% of the stuff that comes out of organized religion.  |
| Date: 1/28/2002 10:45:00 AM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 37354 Power One, from a humanistic, rational point of view you are correct. The Christian viewpoint is somewhat different. Hugo |
Date: 1/28/2002 11:02:00 AM
From Authorid: 42792
some people just get bored too easily...changing Jesus to a hermaphrodite is a sick thought  |
Date: 1/28/2002 11:06:00 AM
From Authorid: 21867
What? You mean Jesus WASN'T an overwieght, smoking, Afro-American Lesbian...with a limp?   |
Date: 1/28/2002 11:48:00 AM
From Authorid: 27678
Lol, Hugo. And God have mercy, I am just amazed daily at the slams He must endure.  |
Date: 1/28/2002 12:13:00 PM
From Authorid: 3125
That's sad..I wonder if their Jesus named Pat will manage to offer them salvation when Jesus Christ returns..People can mess around,as it is obvious that many has already,and have their own doctrine,but all it will amount to when Jesus Christ returns is a bunch of manmade writing compiled into a book..  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 12:19:00 PM
From Authorid: 33817
Quit riling up the Christians, Hugo!! The company has made it clear that no references to God or Jesus will be changed. Simply things like "...sons of God" will conver to "children of God" etc. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48340-2002Jan28.html |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 12:20:00 PM
From Authorid: 33817
So many of you Christians preach tolerance and practice an entire other philosophy. So quick to judge, so quick to condemn. |
| Date: 1/28/2002 12:22:00 PM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 37354 I will leave this site the day I can no longer get anyone riled up. Hugo |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 12:28:00 PM
From Authorid: 33817
I'll go with you!!! |
Date: 1/28/2002 1:03:00 PM
From Authorid: 3125
Power One..And what will they do with Lev 18 2 "Thou shall not lie with mankind,as with womankind.It is an abomination"..Rom 16-27 "for their women changed the natural use into that which is AGAINST nature AND likewise also the men,leaving the natural use of the woman,burned in lust one toward another,men with men working unseemliness..What will they do with those passages?..If ANYONE makes a book and leaves out or adds to God's Word,then the book is NO LONGER God's Word,but the teachings of man.. |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 1:12:00 PM
From Authorid: 33817
When things are translated between languages, in many instances it is impossible to translate verbatim. Make a stink about that, why don't you? |
| Date: 1/28/2002 1:19:00 PM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 37354 Sorry, Rusure, wrong debate. They are not talking about a gender sexual preference neutral Bible, Yet. Hugo |
Date: 1/28/2002 3:35:00 PM
From Authorid: 11240
Not that I think it will happen, but if I had a vote I'd go with Jesse. God Bless.  |
Date: 1/28/2002 4:31:00 PM
From Authorid: 9130
wonderful idea. really. LOL  |
|
Date: 1/28/2002 6:57:00 PM
From Authorid: 3125
Oops Hugo..LOL..How'd I know..I read the title and saw you were the author..And I took it from there..hehehee fuunnny |
|
Date: 1/29/2002 7:25:00 AM
From Authorid: 16671
I dont EVER see the day that YOU dont rile some one up HUGO. LOL |
Date: 1/29/2002 7:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 27270
See, I'm not a Christian and don't really take the Bible seriously (though I respect anyone's religion while reserving the right to have-or not have-my own). I think this is a case of someone using the Bible to appeal to a certain "market" if you will. But if the Bible is suppose to be "God's Word", how can you change it? And more importantly, how many times has it been changed so far?  |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization
 |
