Date: 11/18/2002 5:15:00 PM
From Authorid: 39737
yeah you are doing it right! Unles...Im doing it wrong!! OH NO!!!!!~*Winter Fairy Dust*~  |
Date: 11/18/2002 5:15:00 PM
From Authorid: 50193
before for singular.  |
|
Date: 11/18/2002 5:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 50193
For plural, you put it after, unless you feel you need an extra s (Dogs' and Dogs's is both acceptable). Generally, the rule is whichever you feel would sound better when said out-loud |
Date: 11/18/2002 5:16:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 54968
Thanks so much VG! :)  |
|
Date: 11/18/2002 5:16:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 54968
LOL WFD! Thanks! :) |
Date: 11/18/2002 5:17:00 PM
From Authorid: 16845
the way you have it now there is more than one dog...  |
|
Date: 11/18/2002 5:18:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 54968
Thankies, Becky!! |
Date: 11/18/2002 8:22:00 PM
From Authorid: 47699
An apostrophe can be used to show possession. I.E.- That is the dog's bone. (It belongs to the dog.) It can also be used to take the place of a letter or letters as in contractions. I.E.- didn't (did not= didn't) In this case, the apostrophe took that place of the 'o' in
'not'. Look at that last sentence I wrote. I used one on either side of a letter and a word. The only time I can think that you would ever put an apostrophe after a word would be if your trying to show possession with a word or name which ends in 's'. I.E.- That's Elvis' best song. (The song belongs to Elvis. I hope this helps you out.  |
Date: 11/18/2002 8:32:00 PM
From Authorid: 26452
I hate English...dogs' I think are more than one dogs...dog's would be one dogs bone....I think.  |
|
Date: 11/19/2002 5:01:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 54968
Thank you, Frank! :) |
|
Date: 11/19/2002 5:01:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 54968
LOL MoonAngel! |
