|
Date: 2/17/2000 1:33:00 AM
I represent a small team of "CCIA"s, ("Crime and
Criminal Intelligence Analysts") who are interested
in the missing person's case you presented on
the unsolvedmysteries.com website. Our team
is presently undergoing post-graduate training
in the field of "Remote Viewing",
(psychic intelligence collection) by former
members of the US Army's remote viewing unit
The work of our team focuses on criminalistics
applications of remote viewing. In other words,
we attempt to use these methods, developed by and
for the US Army Security and Intelligence Command,
to solve crimes that have resisted solution by
conventional investigative means. We are especially
interested in working on cases involving homicides,
serial sexual crimes, and missing persons cases
where there is a high probability of foul play.
The case you have described, involving Julie Newman,
fits the profile we have established for cases
on which we apply Remote Viewing methods, in terms
of age-range of the unsolved case -- between one
and three years since occurrence, as well as the
presence of one or more suspects fitting into a
typical victim/suspect profile. We charge no fees
of any kind for our services, seek no publicity
before, during, or after our involvement in the
case, and make no guarantees as to results. We
do not work directly for private citizens or
organizations, but would, after agreeing to accept
an assignment, establish contact with the law
enforcement agency of jurisdiction in the case, and
attempt to form working relationship with that
agency. Only after making this cooperative
relationship, something we are able to do
routinely because of the high-ranking law
enforcement officials who advise and/or participate
in our activities, do we begin active operations
in investigating a case. All contact between our
team, the source of the case, the law enforcement
agencies involved, and any other parties, will be
routed through a single team representative, in this
case, me. The identities of the remote viewers
actually working on the case will never be
disclosed, and interim and final reports in
connection with our findings will obscure the
identities of the remote viewers assigned, making
them in unamenable to subpoena. Ultimately, our
product will be turned over the law enforcement
agency of jurisdiction, and will serve only to
provide them with investigative leads. Typically,
no part of our team's product will result directly in
prosecution of any party, although, in the past,
they have lead to identification and prosecution
of a suspect.
The one requirement we make of a client -- the
source of our case information -- is that they
agree to provide us with as much "feedback" as
we request. In other words, our remote viewers
work very hard to access and provide information
useful in the investigation of the crime. Often
we produce a large body of information ancillary
to the crime, the crime scene, suspects, witnesses,
and the vitcime and his or her life and
environment. As intelligence analysts we know that
often this information, especially when it is
aggregated and analyzed as a whole, reveals a
useful picture of the crime, the victim,
and its perpetrator. Sometimes, the information
we request will confirm extremely peripheral aspects,
but, by doing so, will give the team members
confidence in their viewing work and other data
obtained in the viewing process. This, too, has
a great deal of importance since telepathic and
clairavoyant phenomona are enhanced by positive
feedback. Accordingly, we need to be able to
acquire detailed information, sometimes
about aspects of the victim and his or her life
that may, on the surface, seem irrelevant or
tangential.
Our methods focus not only on the victim, but on
the suspect, potential accomplices, the location
the victim was last seen, the location to which
the victim was travelling, and the mode of that
travel, as well. Very often, where one of these
"targets" of our inquiry does not result in
sufficient information, we will find that another
"target" element will reveal dispositive data.
In the case of missing person Julie Newman, should
you be interested in requesting our involvement, we
would need you to provide the following additional
information:
a) name and contacting information of the case
source (in this case, you);
b) the exact date, place, and to the extent
possible, the time the missing person was last
confirmed seen;
c) the identity of the former boyfriend;
d) the identity of the blind date;
e) the location and identity of the people with
whom the victim was last seen;
f) the location to which the victim was travelling,
the vehicle travelled in, and the most likely route
that would have been taken;
g) the names of any law enforcement agencies known
to be involved in this case, the names of any
law enforcement officers responsible for the
investigation of the case, and the current status
of the case, as well as its disposition, if known.
Finally, we need at least one photograph, most close
in time to the date of the possible crime, of the
victim and the boyfriend. Photographs of any of
the other parties in the case, as referenced in
the questions above, as well as the mode of
transportation, probably a car, if one is
available. As stated, most important is that you
provide a photograph of the victim and boyfriend.
If you wish to request our involvement in your case,
or have questions, please contact me at my email
address: ursinius@earthlink.net.
I hope we can be of help.
Yours truly,
/s/ Brian Siccoles
for The Interregnum Group
|
